Puzzle Finance Blog


The positives of living in the red


Negative gearing has its benefits but know the risks.

Let's face it: hundreds of thousands of investors are attracted to property because of the tax breaks. According to the Australian Taxation Office, more than 1.1 million people claim negative gearing deductions yearly and receive tax benefits to the tune of $5.5 billion.

Having a negatively geared property allows you to deduct an investment loss from your income, including your salary, but it shouldn't be seen as a panacea for a dud investment choice. There are smart ways to use negative gearing, yet there are also hidden traps that can catch out the unwary and those who don't research thoroughly.

If you borrow to buy a house or unit and the expenses are greater than the income, you are negatively gearing. The ATO gives you back a percentage of this loss, to the extent of your marginal tax rate (that is, if you pay tax at 37 per cent, you'll get back 37 per cent of the loss).

Fledgling investors often seek advice about whether they should use a negative gearing strategy. But negative gearing and positive gearing are not ''strategies''; they are terms that describe a cash position.

An investor's strategy needs to centre on the investment fundamentals, such as selecting the right property in the right area. How to fund it is a separate issue.

For most investors, though, the financial returns rely on long-term capital growth, so the total capital growth must cover the upfront cost of the property, all the holding costs and other fees, such as council rates and stamp duty.

Negative gearing gives you a tax break while you wait out the 10 or 20 years needed to achieve good capital growth.

It's vital at the onset that you find a balance between your cash flow and your investment.

You need to decide early whether you're comfortable paying a $30,000 or a $15,000 shortfall out of your personal cash flow each year.

Also, consider what will happen if you lose your job or your partner stops working.

The risks of negative gearing can be the difference between a good night's sleep and lots of tossing and turning.

The structure you use to hold a property affects tax, too. A property held in a family trust can't claim any negative gearing benefits because a trust isn't a tax-paying entity.

You can tap tax benefits by forming a hybrid discretionary trust, in which a family trust is established alongside a unit trust. But the most common and beneficial structure for investors is to use an individual title to hold property. It's here that the benefits of negative gearing are most prevalent, especially if you're paying the top marginal tax rate of 45 per cent.

Another trap to watch out for is using negative gearing for property held in a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF).

Negative gearing is typically not suited to DIY super because the tax on income is 15 per cent or less.

In fact, the income tax paid on an SMSF can fall to nil, depending on the phase the fund is in. Capital gains tax is discounted by one-third then taxed at 15 per cent within the fund, which is another reason negative gearing should be avoided.

Negative gearing is often derided for inflating property prices. Critics regard the preferential tax treatment of investment property as middle-class welfare that should be scrapped.

Is this going to happen? Don't put any money on it. No government that wants to stay in office will change negative gearing.

The stark fact is that there are 1.1 million voters who provide five out of every six rental properties in Australia and they expect a tax break to do the job.

Posted by Chris Tolhurst - The Age on 14th April, 2012 | Comments | Trackbacks
Tags:

Bookmark and Share

The trackback URL for this page is http://www.puzzlefinance.com.au/trackback?post=25894892


Trackbacks

There are no trackbacks for this post


Comments

There are no comments for this post


Post a Comment

HTML is not allowed in comments, http://... will be automatically linked.


Name (required):


Email Address (not displayed):


Comment (required):


To help prevent spam, please enter the word face here:

Puzzle Finance Blog

About Puzzle Finance


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010

Tags

Purchase or Rent (1)
The Age (1)