Puzzle Finance Blog

Protecting the family home

The threat of losing the family home is the stuff of nightmares for the small business owner. So how do you protect it against creditors or litigants if business starts to go bad?

According to Chris Balalovski, head of strategic advice, private wealth for Perpetual, there are several ways a business owner can ring-fence the family home from his or her business activities. He also says there are some common misconceptions about the right way to protect this important asset.

“Sometimes people think that establishing a business in a company or trust structure gives the business owner the protection of the corporate veil and that creditors only have access to the company's or trust's assets and this is generally true,” says Balalovski.

“But as a director or trustee, if the structure has a deficit of assets to pay the debt, the creditor can sometimes use the personal assets of the director or trustee to make up the difference.”

Balalovski says there are three main ways to protect the family home in these circumstances. The first is to give majority ownership of the home to a person who is not at risk from any bankruptcy or litigation procedures - typically a spouse.

“This does not usually incur any stamp duty or capital gains tax liabilities, but the business owner should still retain some interest in the family home to ensure the asset can't be dealt with without their authority,” he says, adding that this strategy “still means the asset is held by the family, but the business owner is largely disassociated from it".

Emma Woolley, special counsel with law firm Hall & Wilcox, says business owners have to be aware of the traps of taking this approach.

“If the unexposed spouse has the house in their name it's essential to make sure they haven't guaranteed any loans in the business. If they have, it could mean they and the home are exposed in the event of litigation.”

She says there are also estate planning considerations to be made in the event the family home is in the name of the unexposed spouse and he or she dies.

“If the unexposed spouse has left everything to the exposed spouse, if there is litigation the house would still be under threat. An alternative is to leave everything to the kids and give the exposed spouse the right to occupy the property for life in the will.”

Woolley says business owners who have signed over the family home to the unexposed partner shouldn't worry about getting their fair share of the value of the asset if the relationship breaks down.

“The Family Court doesn't care whose name the house is in, so the business owner should still be entitled to any proceeds from the sale of the home in a property settlement,” she says.

An alternate strategy to signing over the property to the unexposed partner is to undertake borrowings and to allow a related charge to be made over the main residence. This structure means very little equity in the home would be available to an external party.

“But as the value of the asset rises and the business owner builds equity in it, there will be greater exposure to potential creditors, so there's a need to periodically refresh the charge to ensure not much equity is available to someone who sues the business owner,” Balalovski says.

A third option is to use a service entity, which delivers asset protection and tax advantages. Typically a business owner would create a service entity that owns assets to be used by the business such as premises and plant and equipment and provides labour to it as well.

“Separating these assets into a service entity means someone who might have received faulty goods or services from the business owner and who subsequently launches a legal action has never had dealings with the service entity and can't pursue the assets held by it,” he explains.

“But the Commissioner of Taxation is very concerned about the rates paid to service entities, so it's very important that the rates paid are appropriate and not artificial.”

Interestingly, superannuation has statutory protection from creditors if you are a small business owner. “Unless the business owner makes an unusual contribution to defeat the creditors when they know litigation is on the cards, super is protected,” says Balalovski.

Posted by Alexandra Cain - The Age on 15th July, 2011 | Comments | Trackbacks

Bookmark and Share

The trackback URL for this page is http://www.puzzlefinance.com.au/trackback?post=24411185


There are no trackbacks for this post


There are no comments for this post

Post a Comment

HTML is not allowed in comments, http://... will be automatically linked.

Name (required):

Email Address (not displayed):

Comment (required):

To help prevent spam, please enter the word ease here:

Puzzle Finance Blog

About Puzzle Finance


September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010


Purchase or Rent (1)
The Age (1)

Recent Puzzle Finance Blog Posts

8 Sep 17: Why property investors aren’t necessarily as rich as you think they are Investors have surged in the Sydney and Melbourne property markets at  record levels  over the past few years, with many amassing significant prope... [More...]
5 Sep 17: ‘Risks magnified’ when investors use equity loans to buy multiple properties A common strategy used by property investors around Australia to amass large portfolios of real estate is potentially very risky, experts warn. More th... [More...]
30 Aug 17: Investors can own multiple properties but still be eligible for first-home buyer benefits A little-known loophole across all states and territories is allowing investors, who already own multiple properties, to take advantage of governmen... [More...]
29 Aug 17: A homeowner's guide to letting on Airbnb More and more homeowners are looking for ways to increase their household income. This includes looking to their family home to provide extra funds through Ai... [More...]
27 Aug 17: Organise finance early this spring property season  With more properties soon to hit the market, lenders will be stretched and house hunters should organise finance well ahead of time, prop... [More...]
26 Aug 17: The obvious mistakes first home buyers make JUST say you won the Lotto or a kindly relative left you a sizeable inheritance and, hooray, you have a deposit for a bedsit in a far-flung corner of Sydney.... [More...]