Puzzle Finance Blog

Focus on the real issues with SMSF borrowing

A recent letter to the banks from the regulator, APRA, saw the financial media light up with doom and gloom about borrowing by self-managed super funds (SMSFs). ‘APRA warns banks on loans to SMSFs’ was a typical example.

Except that APRA didn’t. It was a classic media beat up. APRA’s letter, a clarification of how SMSF loans should be treated for regulatory capital purposes, simply advised they wouldn’t get the more generous treatment applied to normal home loans.

Despite APRA stating that SMSF loans may have a ‘potentially higher loss profile’ I doubt the letter was a shock to the banks and it wasn’t much of a warning. APRA themselves pointed out that it was the banks’ job to assess the risk of their lending.

If you’re borrowing in your SMSF you don’t need to stress about APRA raining on your parade. But there are a few issues you should consider.

Firstly, there’s the Cooper Review into superannuation, which suggested that SMSF borrowing be reviewed. If the practice was to be banned or limited going forward, the banks might seek to exit the business, pushing interest rates upwards and making refinancing virtually impossible.

Relying on the banks to keep your investment makes you a captive client. As Australian car dealers discovered during the GFC, being captive to lenders who decide to leave the market is a very ugly place to be.

If you are going to borrow in your SMSF make sure you have a way to refinance the loan if your bank wants out. You don’t want to become a forced seller in a buyers’ market.

Next up, there’s the ATO. They recently warned (Taxpayer Alert TA 2012/7) about lax implementation of property borrowing arrangements and the potential penalties to SMSFs.

When a SMSF borrows to buy property it’s a lot more complicated than a standard home purchase. For instance, the trustee of the holding trust (a requirement of these arrangements) needs to enter into the sale contract. It’s not as simple as bidding at a weekend auction in your own name and doing the formalities down the track.

If you’re undertaking a property borrowing arrangement you must follow the rules to the letter. Otherwise the ATO has said you will get whacked.

Finally, there’s the property market generally. Buying assets at all-time high prices and historically low interest rates hasn’t tended to be the best investment strategy. There will always be individual opportunities in such an opaque and inefficient market, but the average investor should question whether they want to punt their retirement on property.

I’m not in the ‘impending house price crash’ camp but, over the medium term, significant price falls are a possibility. Everything hinges on the level of unemployment, which the average Australian is already exposed to.

If losing your job would leave you struggling to pay your mortgage, think twice before exposing your super to the same risks. For most investors it’s not worth it.

Of course, if you don’t want to worry about future rules and regulations, ATO crackdowns or lack of diversification, there’s an easy solution. Keep your SMSF debt free.

Richard Livingston is the managing director of Intelligent Investor Super Advisor, an online service providing SMSF and investing advice. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 282288).

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/money/super-and-funds/focus-on-the-real-issues-with-smsf-borrowing-20130131-2dm5s.html#ixzz2JWDqQZEA

Posted by Richard Livingstone - The Age on 31st January, 2013 | Comments | Trackbacks

Bookmark and Share

The trackback URL for this page is http://www.puzzlefinance.com.au/trackback?post=26631392


There are no trackbacks for this post


There are no comments for this post

Post a Comment

HTML is not allowed in comments, http://... will be automatically linked.

Name (required):

Email Address (not displayed):

Comment (required):

To help prevent spam, please enter the word beck here:

Puzzle Finance Blog

About Puzzle Finance


September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010


Purchase or Rent (1)
The Age (1)